Ads
Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads

Ads





  • ann arbor MICHIGAN
    Univesity of Michigan
    Critic: Jeff HALSTEAD

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    David ALCALA: Utilizing insight’s gained by studying Stanley Kubrick’s films and his usage of distilled
    perspectives, a method was found with which to develop space.
    [MORE]


  • los angeles CALIFORNIA
    SCI-Arc
    Critic: Ferda KOLATAN

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Ryan FARNAM: The thesis reevaluates the museum as an experiential environment that generates visual effects rather than merely a place to exhibit artifacts. It argues that museum designs are just as important as the contents within, asserting the importance of architecture and its connection to the urban experience.
    [MORE]


  • los angeles CALIFORNIA
    SCI-Arc
    Critic: Mark FOSTER GAGE

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Dila ERTEN: The Robotic Farming City project is a solution for Midwest’s current agricultural infrastructure problems. With the decrease in the number of farms in Midwest and extreme population growth, the demand for food has been increasing rapidly.
    [MORE]


  • ann arbor MICHIGAN
    University of Michigan
    Critic: Jeff HALSTEAD

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Kelvin CHEN: The project is a multistory hotel, trying to integrate some cinematic ideas from the film Rear Window, which is famous for its set design, to explore different visual connections in space.
    [MORE]


  • troy NEW YORK
    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    Critic: William VIRGIL

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Studio POST: This Post includes a variety of work from the William VIRGIL studio at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute [MORE]


  • ann arbor MICHIGAN
    University of Michigan
    Critic: Perry KULPER

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Gary CHUNG: This thesis embarks on designing speculative follies based on intertwining an accumulation of both the components and counterparts of a (themed) device with architectural elements from various eras in order to question its role on the means of cultural production. These didactic objects may register or locate certain details to explore its vividness in respect to awareness. By purposing the purposeless, a range of communicative potentials and a sense of working on other ideas is foregrounded.
    [MORE]


  • oxford ENGLAND
    Oxford Brookes University
    Critic: Barry WARK, Maria KNUTSSON-HALL and Andreas KÖRNER

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    James GREGAN: The project pictured is for the Oxford Botanical Gardens. Its mission statement is ‘To promote the furtherance of learning and to glorify nature. The garden aims to educate about the importance of plants, the conservation of plants and to support teaching and research of plants anywhere.
    [MORE]


  • philadelphia PENNSLYVANIA
    University of Pennsylvania
    Critic: Andrew SAUNDERS

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Caleb EHLY: The profile exists in unison with that of the object, it defines articulation of control and existence. By enacting an investigation of extraction and mining of architectural tropes, the discovery of profiles synonymous with context and site.
    [MORE]


  • college station TEXAS
    University of Texas A&M
    Critic: Nathan HUME and Gabriel ESQUIVEL

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Luis Fernando MUNOZ, Stephanie MADDAMMA, Sephorah BELIZOR, and Brazos PINTO: This project is an exploration of graphics and their interpretations and possibilities.
    [MORE]


  • chicago ILLINOIS
    Penn Design
    Critic: Kutan AYATA

    suckerPUNCH: Describe your project.
    Alexander BAHR: With the rise of fake news, alternative facts and confirmation bias, being a daily peril of contemporary life, this project explored and researched if there existed a danger between fact and belief within architecture, and if so how can it be either exploited or embraced.
    [MORE]